observerОбозреватель-ObserverОбозреватель–Observer2074-2975Институт стран СНГ10.48137/2074-2975_2023_3_91observer-31Research ArticleПолитологияPolitical sciencesНаучная дипломатия: роль и место в системе международных отношенийScience diplomacy: role and place in the system of international relationsНугуспановА.NuguspanovA.

НУГУСПАНОВ Алишер – аспирант Российской академии народного хозяйства и государственной службы при Президенте Российской Федерации, стажёр-исследователь Института региональных и международных исследований

NUGUSPANOV A. – Postgraduate student at the Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, intern researcher at the Institute for Regional and International Studies

a.nuguspanov@gmail.comРоссийская академия народного хозяйства и государственной службы при Президенте Российской Федерации; Институт региональных и международных исследованийРоссияRussian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration; Institute for Regional and International StudiesRussian Federation202315122023039199Copyright © Нугуспанов А., 20232023Нугуспанов А.Nuguspanov A.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://www.observer-journal.ru/jour/article/view/31

Автором проведён анализ основ формирования концепции научной дипломатии. Выявлены основные проблемы научной дипломатии и её преимущества как механизма внешней политики.

The article presents an analysis of the foundations of the formation of the concept of science diplomacy. The main problems of science diplomacy and its advantages as a mechanism of foreign policy are revealed.

научная дипломатиямеждународное научное сотрудничествоscience diplomacyinternational scientific cooperationReferencesЗонова Т.В. Современная модель дипломатии: истоки становления и перспективы развития. М.: РОССПЭН, 2003. – 333 с.Zonova T.V. Sovremennaya model’ diplomatii: istoki stanovleniya i perspektivy razvitiya. M.: ROSSPEN, 2003. – 333 s.Манжулина О.А. Публичная дипломатия США. Дис. ... канд. полит. наук. СПб., 2005. – 203 с.Manzhulina O.A. Publichnaya diplomatiya SSHA. Dis. ... kand. polit. nauk. SPb., 2005. – 203 s.Павлов Е.Я. Научная дипломатия в России. Конституционно-правовые основы // Обозреватель–Observer. 2018. № 11. С. 102–119.Pavlov E.YA. Nauchnaya diplomatiya v Rossii. Konstitucionno-pravovye osnovy // Obozrevatel’–Observer. 2018. № 11. S. 102–119.Понарина Е. От ядра до дипломатии. До всех тонкостей жизни есть дело учёным // Поиск. Еженедельная газета научного сообщества. 2017. № 17(1455) // URL: https://www.rfbr.ru/rffi/ru/press_about/o_2041833Ponarina E. Ot yadra do diplomatii. Do vsekh tonkostej zhizni est’ delo uchyonym // Poisk. Ezhenedel’naya gazeta nauchnogo soobshchestva. 2017. № 17(1455) // URL: https://www.rfbr.ru/rffi/ru/press_about/o_2041833Definitions of public diplomacy // URL: http://fletcher.tufts.edu/Murrow/Diplomacy/DefinitionsDefinitions of public diplomacy // URL: http://fletcher.tufts.edu/Murrow/Diplomacy/DefinitionsDreifus C., Fedoroff N. Advocate for Science Diplomacy // The New York Times. 2008. 18 August // URL: https://www.nytimes.com/2008/08/19/science/19conv.htmlDreifus C., Fedoroff N. Advocate for Science Diplomacy // The New York Times. 2008. 18 August // URL: https://www.nytimes.com/2008/08/19/science/19conv.htmlElbe S., Buckland-Merrett G. Data, Disease and Diplomacy: GISAID’s Innovative Contribution to Global Health // Global Challenges. 2017. № 1(1). P. 33–46.Elbe S., Buckland-Merrett G. Data, Disease and Diplomacy: GISAID’s Innovative Contribution to Global Health // Global Challenges. 2017. № 1(1). P. 33–46.Fahnrich B. Science Diplomacy: Investigating the Perspective of Scholars on Politics – Science Collaboration in International Affairs // Public Understanding of Science. 2015. № 26(6). P. 688–703.Fahnrich B. Science Diplomacy: Investigating the Perspective of Scholars on Politics – Science Collaboration in International Affairs // Public Understanding of Science. 2015. № 26(6). P. 688–703.Flink T., Schreiterer U. Science Diplomacy at the Intersection of S&T Policies and Foreign Affairs: Toward a Typology of National Approaches // Science and Public Policy. 2010. № 37(9). P. 665–677.Flink T., Schreiterer U. Science Diplomacy at the Intersection of S&T Policies and Foreign Affairs: Toward a Typology of National Approaches // Science and Public Policy. 2010. № 37(9). P. 665–677.Gluckman P.D., Turekian V.C., Grimes R.W., Kishi T. Science Diplomacy: A Pragmatic Perspective from the Inside // Science & Diplomacy. 2017. № 6(4) // URL: http://www.sciencediplomacy.org/article/2018/pragmatic-perspectiveGluckman P.D., Turekian V.C., Grimes R.W., Kishi T. Science Diplomacy: A Pragmatic Perspective from the Inside // Science & Diplomacy. 2017. № 6(4) // URL: http://www.sciencediplomacy.org/article/2018/pragmatic-perspectiveHoffman A.M. A conceptualization of trust in international relations // European Journal of International Relations. 2002. № 8(3). P. 375–401.Hoffman A.M. A conceptualization of trust in international relations // European Journal of International Relations. 2002. № 8(3). P. 375–401.Kaltofen C., Acuto M. Science Diplomacy: Introduction to a Boundary Problem // Global Policy. 2018. № 9. Suppl. 3. P. 8–14.Kaltofen C., Acuto M. Science Diplomacy: Introduction to a Boundary Problem // Global Policy. 2018. № 9. Suppl. 3. P. 8–14.Lord K.M., Turekian V.C. Science and Society: Time for a New Era of Science Diplomacy // Science. 2007. № 315(5813). P. 769–770.Lord K.M., Turekian V.C. Science and Society: Time for a New Era of Science Diplomacy // Science. 2007. № 315(5813). P. 769–770.Rathbun B.C. Before Hegemony: Generalized Trust and the Creation and Design of International Security Organizations // International Organization. 2011. № 65(2). P. 243–273.Rathbun B.C. Before Hegemony: Generalized Trust and the Creation and Design of International Security Organizations // International Organization. 2011. № 65(2). P. 243–273.Ruzicka J., Keating V.C. Going Global: Trust Research and International Relations // Journal of Trust Research. 2015. № 5(1). P. 8–26.Ruzicka J., Keating V.C. Going Global: Trust Research and International Relations // Journal of Trust Research. 2015. № 5(1). P. 8–26.Slaus I., Wallace H., Cuhls K., Soler M.G. Science Diplomacy // Europe’s Future: Open Innovation, Open Science, Open to the World. P. 107. 106–118.Slaus I., Wallace H., Cuhls K., Soler M.G. Science Diplomacy // Europe’s Future: Open Innovation, Open Science, Open to the World. P. 107. 106–118.Susskind L., Islam S. Water Diplomacy: Creating Value and Building Trust in Transboundary Water Negotiations // Science & Diplomacy. 2012. № 1(3) // URL: http://www.sciencediplomacy.org/perspective/2012/water-diplomacySusskind L., Islam S. Water Diplomacy: Creating Value and Building Trust in Transboundary Water Negotiations // Science & Diplomacy. 2012. № 1(3) // URL: http://www.sciencediplomacy.org/perspective/2012/water-diplomacyThe Madrid Declaration on Science Diplomacy. EU Science Diplomacy // URL: https://www.s4d4c.eu/s4d4c-1st-global-meeting/the-madrid-declaration-on-science-diplomacy/The Madrid Declaration on Science Diplomacy. EU Science Diplomacy // URL: https://www.s4d4c.eu/s4d4c-1st-global-meeting/the-madrid-declaration-on-science-diplomacy/Wagner C. The elusive Partnership: Science and Foreign Policy // Science and Public Policy. 2002. № 29(6). P. 409–417 // URL: https://doi.org/10.3152/147154302781780741Wagner C. The elusive Partnership: Science and Foreign Policy // Science and Public Policy. 2002. № 29(6). P. 409–417 // URL: https://doi.org/10.3152/147154302781780741

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.