The state in the liberal mainstream: pro et contra
https://doi.org/10.48137/2074-2975_2023_5_19
Abstract
The authors analyze the views of representatives of liberal currents on the evolution of state institutions in the modern world and assess its relation-ship with civil society and elites.
About the Authors
V. Egorov
Plekhanov Russian Economic University; Bauman Moscow State Technical University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
EGOROV Vladimir G. – Doctor of History, Doctor of Economics, Professor, Director of the Scientific School «Economic Theory» of Plekhanov Russian Economic University, Professor at the Bauman Moscow State Technical University
V. Shtol
Diplomatic Academy of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Russia
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
SHTOL Vladimir V. – Doctor of Political Sciences, Professor, Professor at the Diplomatic Academy of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Russia
References
1. Adzhemoglu D., Robinson Dzh. Pochemu odni strany bogatye, a drugie bednye. Proiskhozhdenie vlasti, procvetaniya i nishchety. M.: AST, 2015. – 692 s.
2. Adzhemoglu D., Robinson Dzh. Uzkij koridor. M.: AST, 2021. – 703 s.
3. Al’ber M. Kapitalizm protiv kapitalizma. SPb.: Ekonomicheskaya shkola, 1998. – 292 s.
4. Veber A. Krizis evropejskogo myshleniya o gosudarstve. SPb.: Universitetskaya kniga, 1999. – 564 s.
5. Gaman-Golutvina O.V. Mirovoj opyt reformirovaniya sistem gosudarstvennogo upravleniya // Vestnik MGIMO-Universiteta. 2013. № 4. S. 187–194.
6. Gobbs T. Leviafan, ili Materiya, forma i vlast’ gosudarstva, cerkovnogo i grazhdanskogo. Gl. XIII. O estestvennom sostoyanii chelovecheskogo roda v ego otnoshenii k schast’yu i bedstviyam lyudej // URL: https://www.civisbook.ru/files/File/Gobbs_Leviafan.pdf
7. Davydov O.B. Filosofskij kommunitarizm kak aktual’naya paradigma social’nogo bytiya // Sovremennye issledovaniya social’nyh problem (elektronnyj nauchnyj zhurnal Modern Research of Social Problems). 2015. № 10. S. 85–91.
8. Deklaraciyi nezavisimosti kiberprostranstva ispolnilos’ 20 let // URL: https://habr.com/ru/articles/390175/
9. Dzhesson B. Gosudarstvo. Proshloe, nastoyashchee i budushchee. M.: ID «Delo» RANHiGS, 2019. – 504 s.
10. Kollier P. Budushchee kapitalizma. M.: Izd-vo Instituta Gajdara, 2021. – 376 s.
11. Lapkin V.V. Razmezhevaniya v territorial’nyh soobshchestvah, konsolidaciya nacional’nyh gosudarstv i novye vyzovy ekstraterritorial’nosti // YUzhno-Rossijskij zhurnal social’nyh nauk. 2021. T. 22. № 2. S. 4–20.
12. Malgan Dzh. Iskusstvo gosudarstvennoj strategii: Mobilizaciya vlasti i znaniya vo imya vseobshchego blaga. M.: Izd-vo Instituta Gajdara, 2011. – 468 s.
13. Matveev s.R. Svoboda i poryadok: liberal’nyj konservatizm Fransua Gizo. M.: VSHE, 2019. – 232 s.
14. Naumkin V.V. Model’ ne-zapada: sushchestvuet li gosudarstvo-civilizaciya? // Polis. 2020. № 4. S. 78–93.
15. Pantin V.I., Lapkin V.V. Gosudarstvennoe stroitel’stvo v Respublike Belarus’: rol’ social’nyh razmezhevanij i politicheskih razdelenij // YUzhno-Rossijskij zhurnal social’nyh nauk. 2022. № 2. S. 6–17.
16. Rend A. Apologiya kapitalizma. M.: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, 2003. – 355 s.
17. Rend A. Atlant raspravil plechi. V 3 knigah. M.: Al’pina Pablisher, 2015. – 1394 s.
18. Tanci V. Pravitel’stvo i rynki. M.: Izd-vo Instituta Gajdara, 2018. – 578 s.
19. Hajek F.A. fon. Doroga v rabstvo. M.: AST, 2021. – 317 s.
20. Carev V., Kotovski M. Nasledie Margaret Tetcher: neravenstvo, bednost’, social’naya napryazhyonnost’ // URL: https://marx.kz/tribuna/251-nasledie-margaret-tjetcher-neravenstvo-bednost-socialnaja-naprjazhennost-chast-1.html
21. SHmitt K. Gosudarstvo i politicheskaya forma. M.: VSHE, 2010. – 272 s.
22. SHmitt K. Duhovno-istoricheskoe sostoyanie sovremennogo parlamentarizma // SHmitt K. Politicheskaya teologiya. M.: Kanon-press-C; Kuchkovo pole, 2000. – 333 s.
23. Engel’s F. Proiskhozhdenie sem’i, chastnoj sobstvennosti i gosudarstva // Marks K., Engel’s F. Izbrannye proizvedeniya v 3 tomah. M.: Politizdat, 1986. T. 3. – 639 s.
24. Best S., Kellner D. The postmodern turn. N.Y.: Guilford Press, 1997. – 306 p.
25. Calkivik A. Poststructuralism and Postmodernism in International Relations // International Relations Theory Online Publication. Nov 2017. p. 1–29 // URL: https://edisciplinas.usp.br/pluginfile.php/7235362/course/section/6380661/%C3%87alk%C4%B1vik%2C%20Poststructuralism%20and%20Postmodernism%20in%20International%20Relations.pdf
26. Cooper R. The post-modern state and the world order. L.: Demos, 1996. – 50 p.
27. Cvetkovich A., Kellner D. Articulating and The Local: Globalization and Cultural Studies. 1 st ed. N.Y.: Routledge, 1997. – 272 p.
28. Featherstone M. Global Culture: An Introduction // Global Culture: Nationalism, Globalism and Modernity. L.: Sage, 1990. Vol. 7. Iss. 2–3. p. 1–14.
29. Featherstone M., Lash s. Globalization, modernity, and the spatialization of social theory: An untroduction // Featherstone M., Lash s., Robertson R. Global modernities. L.: UK, 1995. p. 1–24.
30. Gibbs N. The All-American President Ronald Wilson Reagan. June 14. 2004.
31. Giddens A. The Consequences of Modernity. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1990 // URL: https://voidnetwork.gr/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/The-Consequences-of-Modernity-by-Anthony-Giddens.pdf
32. Historical Debt Outstanding // URL: https://www.treasurydirect.gov/govt/reports/pd/histbebt/histdebt_histo4.htm
33. Historical Income Tax Rates and Brackets, 1862–2021 // Tax Foundation // URL: https://taxfoundation.org/historical-income-tax-rates-brackets/
34. Kellner D. Globalization and the Postmodern Turn // URL: http://www.gseis.ucla.edn/faculty/Kellner/
35. Overtveldt J. van. The Chicago School. Chicago: Agate, 2007. – 432 p.
36. Wilson R., Dissayanake W. Global/Local: Cultural Production and the Transnational Imaginary, 1996. – 408 p. // URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctv11cw21n
Review
For citations:
Egorov V., Shtol V. The state in the liberal mainstream: pro et contra. Обозреватель–Observer. 2023;(5):19-32. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.48137/2074-2975_2023_5_19
Views:
220
Email this article 