Proactive defense: judicial practice and the prospect of implementation
https://doi.org/10.48137/2074-2975_2023_3_121
Abstract
The article is devoted to the consideration of problematic issues of the institute of necessary defense in the context of the so-called “proactive” defense, which implies protection from encroachment that is not yet being carried out or even threatening, but only capable of threatening (threatening) its implementation. The authors conclude that proactive defense is permissible in all cases when it comes to preparing to commit crimes against the security of Russia by causing any harm to the enemy in order to protect constitutionally significant values with mandatory compliance with the principles of necessity, proportionality and proportionality.
About the Authors
V. MerkuryevRussian Federation
MERKURYEV Viktor V. – Doctor of Law, Professor, Head of the Department of Scientific Support of Prosecutorial Supervision and Strengthening of the Rule of Law in the field of federal security, Interethnic Relations and Countering Extremism
I. Tarakanov
Russian Federation
TARAKANOV Ilya A. – Candidate of Law, Associate Professor, Assistant Professor of the Department of Criminal Law and Criminology of the Faculty of Law
References
1. Atabaeva T.SH. Neobhodimaya oborona: teoriya, zakonodatel’stvo, praktika primeneniya. Dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk. Barnaul, 2004. – 230 s.
2. Demidov YU.N. Ugolovno-pravovye mery bor’by s pravonarusheniyami v ekstremal’nyh usloviyah. M.: Izd-vo UMC pri GUK MVD RF, 1993. – 76 s.
3. Kotlyar V.S. Pravo na preventivnuyu samooboronu i sovremennoe mezhdunarodnoe pravo // Gosudarstvo i pravo. 2005. № 10. S. 75–83.
4. Merkur’ev V.V. Organizovannoe soprotivlenie bor’be s prestupnost’yu: monografiya. M.: YUrlitinform, 2013. – 488 s.
5. Milyukov S.F. Rossijskoe ugolovnoe zakonodatel’stvo. Opyt kriticheskogo analiza. SPb.: Znanie, SPbIVESEP, 2000. – 279 s.
6. Pashe-Ozerskij N.N. Neobhodimaya oborona i krajnyaya neobhodimost’ po sovetskomu ugolovnomu pravu. M.: Gosyurizdat, 1962. – 181 s.
7. Popov A.N. Prestupleniya protiv lichnosti pri smyagchayushchih obstoyatel’stvah. SPb.: YUrid. centr Press, 1998. – 465 s.
8. Postanovlenie Konstitucionnogo Suda Rossijskoj Federacii po delu o proverke konstitucionnosti ne vstupivshego v silu mezhdunarodnogo Dogovora mezhdu Rossijskoj Federaciej i Doneckoj Narodnoj Respublikoj o prinyatii v Rossijskuyu Federaciyu Doneckoj Narodnoj Respubliki i obrazovaniya v sostave Rossijskoj Federacii novogo sub»ekta ot 2 oktyabrya 2022 g. № 36-P // Rossijskaya gazeta. 2022. № 222. 3 oktyabrya
9. Postanovlenie Plenuma Verhovnogo Suda RF ot 31 maya 2022 g. № 11 «O vnesenii izmenenij v postanovlenie Plenuma Verhovnogo Suda Rossijskoj Federacii ot 27 sentyabrya 2012 goda № 19 “O primenenii sudami zakonodatel’stva o neobhodimoj oborone i prichinenii vreda pri zaderzhanii lica, sovershivshego prestuplenie”» // Rossijskaya gazeta. 2022. № 129. 17 iyunya
10. Senatory i eksperty obsudili voprosy zakonodatel’nogo regulirovaniya predelov neobhodimoj oborony // Sovet Federacii Federal’nogo Sobraniya Rossijskoj Federacii // URL: http://council.gov.ru/events/news/139436/
11. Sluckij I.I. Obstoyatel’stva, isklyuchayushchie ugolovnuyu otvetstvennost’. L.: Izd-vo Leningradskogo universiteta, 1956. – 118 s.
12. Sudebnaya praktika Verhovnogo Suda SSSR. 1945. Vyp. VI. M., 1946. – 31 s.
13. Farhutdinov I.Z. Izrail’skaya doktrina o preventivnoj samooborone i mezhdunarodnoe pravo // Evrazijskij yuridicheskij zhurnal. 2016. № 8. S. 15–32.
14. Farhutdinov I.Z. Ot Monro do Trampa: doktrina SSHA o predvoskhishchayushchem voennom udare i mezhdunarodnoe pravo // Elektronnoe prilozhenie k Rossijskomu yuridicheskomu zhurnalu. 2017. № 3. S. 36–51.
15. Federal’nyj zakon ot 3 aprelya 1995 g. № 40-FZ «O federal’noj sluzhbe bezopasnosti» // Rossijskaya gazeta. 1995. № 72. 12 aprelya
16. Federal’nyj zakon ot 3 iyulya 2016 g. № 226-FZ «O vojskah nacional’noj gvardii Rossijskoj Federacii» // Rossijskaya gazeta. 2016. № 146. 6 iyulya
17. Federal’nyj zakon ot 7 fevralya 2011 g. № 3-FZ «O policii» // Rossijskaya gazeta. 2011. № 25. 8 fevralya
18. Hrestomatiya po istorii gosudarstva i prava SSSR. Dooktyabr’skij period. / pod red. YU.P. Titova, O.I. CHistyakova. M.: YUridicheskaya literatura, 1990. – 479 c.
19. SHavgulidze T.G. Neobhodimaya oborona. Tb.: Mecniereba, 1966. – 158 s.
Review
For citations:
Merkuryev V., Tarakanov I. Proactive defense: judicial practice and the prospect of implementation. Обозреватель–Observer. 2023;(3):121-130. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.48137/2074-2975_2023_3_121